Bahasa Inggris Akuntansi: Penyusunan Silabus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25181/prosemnas.v0i0.508Abstrak
Implementation KKNI (Indonesian National Qualifications Framework) is an effort toimprove the quality and competitiveness of college graduates. Lampung State Polytechnic, as one of the vocational education, has the responsibility of creating learners who are ready to work both independently or fill existing vacancies. This can be achieved by improving the quality of process and product quality in the higher education system in particular Lampung State Polytechnic. Improved product quality can be achieved by determining the qualifications required of learners, especially those associated with the world of work. This study aims to: 1) formulating the English curriculum based Accounting KKNI 2) formulate a plan of lectures and 3) formulate a model of learning and teaching English KKNI based Accounting. Furthermore, this study will focus on the development of teaching materials and evaluation tools. The method used is qualitative descriptive. Data about the needs of students of English language competence acquired through 1) a questionnaire 2) interview 3) observations and 4) documentation. The participants involved from this study are Accounting students, alumni, chairman of the PS and stakeholders using graduate courses inAccounting. The results showed English language learning curriculum needs to providemore servings on reading and writing skills, because the language skills can help graduates have the necessary competence.Keywords: KKNI, needs analysis, learning modelUnduhan
Referensi
Sari, D.P : Bahasa Inggris Akuntansi: Penyusunan Silabus
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pengembangan Teknologi Pertanian V Polinela 2016 425
Songhori, Mehdi Haseli. 2008. Introduction to Needs Analysis. English for Specific Purposes World, Issue 4,
[online], (www.esp-world.info. diakses tanggal 10 Desember 2011)
Sugiyono, Prof. 2008. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D.
Bandung. Alfabeta.
Tangpermpoon, T. 2008. Integrated Approaches to Improve Students Writing Skills for English Major
Students. ABAC Journal Vol. 28, No. 2 (May-August).
Wallace, C. 1992. Reading. Oxford. Oxford University Press.
West, R. (1994). ‘Needs Analysis in Language Teaching’. Language Teaching Journal No. 27.
White, Goodith. 2005. Listening and good language learners. In Griffiths, Carol. 2008. Lessons from Good
Language Learners. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Wiersma, William. 1986. Research Methods in Education; An Introduction. Fourth Edition. Boston. Allyn
and Bacon IncSari, D.P : Bahasa Inggris Akuntansi: Penyusunan Silabus
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pengembangan Teknologi Pertanian V Polinela 2016
Johns, T.F. 1981. Some Problems of A world-wide Profession. In J. McDonough and T. French (Eds) The
ESP teacher: role, development and prospects. ELT Documents 112.
Kennedy, C. and Bolitho, R. 1984. English for Specific Purposes. Hong Kong. Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
R. Mackay and A.J. Mountford. 1978. Identifying the Needs of Adults Learning a Foreign Language.
Englewood. Prentice Hall.
Master, Peter. 1998. The Development of ESP. Responses to ESP. California. San Jose State University
Press.
McDonough. 1984. ESP in Perspective. London. Collins ELT. Mason D. 1994. Planning An English Course
for Students of Health Care. English Teaching Forum Volume 32.
Munby, 1978. Communicative Syllabus Design. A Sociolinguistic Model for Defining the Content of
Purpose-specific Language Programmes. Oxford. Oxford University Press.
Nababan, Leslie. 1993. Evaluating EFL textbook and Materials. English Language Teaching Journal (ELTJ)
Volume 4. Cambridge. Cambridge Uiversity Press.
Nunan, David. 1988. The Learner-Centered Curriculum. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Nunan, David. 1989. Syllabus Design. Oxford. Oxford University Press
Nunan, David. 1991. Language Teaching Methodology. a Textbook for Teacher Hertfordshire: Prentice Hall.
Rabbini. Roberto. 2002. An Introduction to Syllabus Design and Evaluation. The Internet TESL Journal,
Vol. VIII, [online], ( http://iteslj.org/, diakses tanggal 25 Mei 2012)
Rahman et al. 2009. Need Analysis for Developing Writing Course for Foreign Postgraduates in Science and
Technology at National University of Malaysia. The Asian ESP Journal Volume 5.
Richards, Jack. 2001. Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. New York. Cambridge Press.
Richards, J and Renandya, W. 2002. Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology in Language
Teaching. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Richterich, R. 1987. Identifying the Needs of Adults Learning a Foreign Language. The Present Position.
Oxford Pergamon Press.
Robinson, P. C. (1991). ESP Today: A Practitioner's Guide. Hertfortshire. Prentice Hall.
Rowntree, D. 1997. Making Materials-based Learning Work. London. Kogan Page.
Setiyadi, Ag. Bambang. 2006. Metode Penelitian Untuk Pengajaran Bahasa Asing. Bandung. Graha Ilmu.
Sheldon, L. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, Volume 42.
Sheppard, K and Stoller F. L.. 1995. Guidelines for The Integration of Students Projects into ESP
Classroom. English Teaching Forum Volume 33.
Silverman, David. 2005. Doing Qualitative Research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Alwasilah, A. Chaedar. 2001. Language, Culture and Education: A Potrait of Contemporary Indonesia.
Bandung: VC. ANDIRA
Alwasilah, A. Chaedar. 2002. Language, Culture, and Education: Potrait of Contemporary Indonesia.
Bandung. CV Andira.
Alwasilah, A. Chaedar. 2009. Pokoknya Kualitatif. Dasar-dasar Merancang dan Melakukan Penelitian
Kualitatif. Jakarta. PT. Dunia Pustaka Jaya.
Anthony, L. 2006. English for Specific Purposes: What does it mean? Why is it different?,[online],
(http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/abstracts/ESPParticle.html, diakses tanggal 7 september 2011)
Bouzidini, Hassan. 2009. Between the ESP Classroom and the Workplace: Bridging the Gap. English
Teaching Forum No. 3.
Chen et al. 2006. From Common Core to Specific. The Asian ESP Journal Volume 1.
Dornyei, Zoltan. 2007. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed
Methodologies.Oxford. Oxford University Press.
Dudley_Evans, Tony. 1998. Development in English for Specific Purposes: A multi disciplinary approach.
Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Emilia, Emi. 2005. A Critical Genre Based Approach to Teaching Academic Writing in Tertiary EFL
Context in Indonesia. (PhD Dissertation). Melbourn. Melbourne University.
Evans, T.D. and John, M.J. 1998. Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A multi-disciplinary
approach. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Gatehouse. Kristen. 2001. Key Issues in English for Specific Purposes (ESP) Curriculum Development. The
Internet TESL Journal, Vol. VII, [online], (http://iteslj.org/, diakses tanggal 5 November)
Harmer, J. 2001. The Practice of English Language Teaching. England. Pearson Education Limited.
Hutchinson, Tom and Waters 1987. English for Specific Purposes: A learner-centered approach.
Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Hyon, S. 1996. Genre in Three Traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quartely Volume 30 no. 4.
Jahangard, Ali. 2007. Evaluation of EFL Materials Taught at Iranian Public High Schools.ASIAN EFL
Journal, Volume 9 Issue 2
Jebahi, Khaled. 2009. Using a Commercially Developed ESP Textbook: A Classroom Dilemma. The Asian
ESP Journal Volume 5.
