Transmisi Harga Beras di Indonesia: Pendekatan Threshold Cointegration

Authors

  • Deby Ananda Difah Bogor Agricultural University, Indonesia
  • Harianto Harianto Bogor Agricultural University
  • Dedi Budiman Hakim Bogor Agricultural University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25181/jofsa.v3i2.1561

Abstract

Rice is a staple food that is still a top priority for most of Indonesian. The widening difference between the rice price at the farmer level and the retail price of rice indicates the presence of asymmetric vertical price transmission. A stable and affordable price is one of the important components needed to maintain food distribution. The price of food commodities that fluctuate too much can be relied upon by farmers as producers, processors, traders to consumers, and about social unrest. To maintain stability of staple food prices, the government is open to keep rice prices at a certain level that can benefit farmers and consumers alike. This research used Threshold Vector Error Correction Model (TVECM) to estimate threshold value and to analyze rice price transmission relationship at farm level and retail level. The data used monthly time series data from January 1990 to September 2016. The results show that the estimated threshold value obtained is -0.092. This suggests that when the deviation of retail price and farmers in long-term equilibrium exceeds 9.2 percentage, the price of retail rice will adjust to achieve its equilibrium so that the two rice prices have a cointegration relationship. Conversely, when the deviation of rice prices is less than 9.2 percentage, there will be no price adjustment and no market integration. The price of retail rice has increased faster than the price at the farm level. Keywords: cointegration, price transmission, rice, threshold

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aprilia A. 2014. Threshold Cointegration pada Pasar Jagung di Indonesia [Tesis]. Malang (ID): Universitas Brawijaya.

Balke N, Fomby TB. 1997. Threshold Cointegration. International Economic Review. 38 (3): 627-45.

[BULOG] Badan Urusan Logistik. 2016. Perum BULOG. Jakarta.

Dodge E, Gemessa S. 2012. Food Security and Price Stabilization in Indonesia: Analysis of Policy Responses. Cambridge (US): Harvard Kennedy School of Government.

Fitriani. 2017. Climate Changing Impact on Rice Production. Journal of Food System & Agribusiness. 1 (1): 41-46.

Hansen BE, Seo B. 2002. Testing for Two-regime Threshold Cointegration in Vector Error-correction Models. Journal of Econometrics. 110 (2002): 293-318.

Laili F, Anindita R, Setiawan B. 2016. Transmisi Harga Pasar Gula Rafinasi di Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pembangunan Pertanian. Universitas Brawijaya.

[Pusdatin] Pusat Data dan Sistem Informasi Pertanian. 2015. Outlook Komoditas Pertanian Subsektor Tanaman Pangan: Padi. Jakarta (ID): Kementerian Pertanian.

Rezitis AN, Reziti I. 2011. Threshold Cointegration in the Greek Milk Market. Journal of International Food and Agribusiness Marketing. 23(3): 231-246.

Sawit MH. 2014. Arah dan Tantangan Baru Pembangunan Pertanian 2014-2019. Jakarta (ID): IAARD Press.

[USDA] United States Department of Agriculture. 2017. Economic Research Service using data from the Foreign Agricultural Service, Production Supply and Distribution (PS&D) and Grain: World Markets and Trade [internet]. [Diunduh tanggal 2 September 2017]. Available on: https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/app/index.html#/app/home.

Vavra P, Goodwin BK. 2005. Analisis of Price Transmission Alaong Food Chain. Working Papers OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, 3, OECD Publishing.

Widarjono. 2013. Ekonometrika Pengantar dan Aplikasinya Disertai Panduan Eviews. Yogyakarta (ID): UPP STIM YKPN.

Yustiningsih F. 2012. Analisa Integrasi Pasar dan Transmisi Harga Beras Petani-Konsumen di Indonesia [Tesis]. Jakarta (ID): Universitas Indonesia.

Published

2019-10-17

How to Cite

Difah, D. A., Harianto, H., & Hakim, D. B. (2019). Transmisi Harga Beras di Indonesia: Pendekatan Threshold Cointegration. Journal of Food System and Agribusiness, 3(2), 80-88. https://doi.org/10.25181/jofsa.v3i2.1561

Issue

Section

Artikel