Analisis Biaya Transaksi pada Kelembagaan Pertanian Gapoktan Penerima Program Pengembangan Usaha Agribisnis Pedesaan (PUAP) di Desa Raman Aji Kecamatan Raman Utara Kabupaten Lampung Timur

Authors

  • Zulkarnain Zulkarnain STIPER Dharma Wacana Metro
  • Windu Mangiring STIPER Dharma Wacana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25181/jppt.v17i3.325

Keywords:

Transaction costs, Institutional, PUAP Program, Gapoktan

Abstract

Gapoktan (Combined Farmer Group) is an agricultural institution implementin PUAP program. In the implementation of the PUAP program, transaction costs can not be avoided. Transaction costs become something that is considered normal and activities become commonplace in the process of making contracts and efforts to achieve common goals.This study aims to analyze and study the structure of transaction costs on agricultural institutions Gapoktan recipient PUAP program in East Lampung regency. The location of this research was conducted in Raman Aji Village, North Raman District, East Lampung Regency.Sampling technique used purposive sampling method (purposely) and simple random sampling method (simple random). Respondents in this study were the chairman and members of farmer group receiving PUAP program at Gapoktan Jaya Makmur in Raman Utara District of East Lampung Regency as many as 68 people.To answer the purpose of research used transaction cost analysis (transaction cost). The result of this research is PUAP program aid fund of Rp. 500.000,00 per member Gapoktan got average transaction cost equal to Rp. 203.235.00. The contract security cost is the largest transaction cost when compared with the information cost and the coordination cost which is 58.61%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akmal, 2006. Koordinasi Antar Instansi Terkait dalam Pelaksanaan Pembangunan di Daerah. Jurnal Demokrasi 5(1) : 1-12.

Allen, D.W. 2005. Marriage as an institution : A New Institutional Economic Approach. Simon Fraser University : Kanada.

Arifin, B. 2006. Transaction Cost Analysis of Upstream-Downstream Relations in Watershed Services : Lessons From Community-Based Forestry Management in Sumatera, Indonesia. Journal of International Agriculture 45(4) : 361-375.

Anggraeni, N.L.V., Muhammad, A.Z.M. dan Bambang, S.H. 2014. Peran dan Koordinasi Stakeholder dalam Pengembangan Kawasan Minapolitan di Keacamatan Nglegok Kabupaten Blitar. Jurnal Administrasi Publik 3(12) : 2070-2076.

Furubotn, E. G., and Rudolf R. 2005. Institutions and Economic Theory : The Contribution of the New Intitutional Economics. Second Edition. Ann Arbor : The University of Michigan Press.

United Nations Development Program (UNDP). 2013. Indek Pembangunan

Manusia.http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/indeks_pembangunan_Manusia. [diakses 14 April 2016]

Mulyana, D. 2005. Ilmu Komunikasi : Suatu Pengatar. Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung.

Nasrul, W. 2012. Pengembangan Kelembagaan Pertanian Untuk Peningkatan Kapasitas Petani terhadap Pembangunan Pertanian. Menara Ilmu 3(29) : 166-174.

Rintjap, A.K., 2015. Efektifitas Komunikasi dalam Penerimaan Informasi pada Kelompok Peternak Sapi Potong di Keacmatan Remhoken, Kabupaten Minahasa, Sulawesi Utara. J PROSEMNAS MASY BIODIV INDOV 1(7) : 1711-1714.

Rahman, A. 2011. Analisis Biaya Transaksi dan Pelaksanaan Pola Kemintraan Usaha Ayam Ras Pedaging di Kabupaten Maros (tesis). Program Studi Agribisnis. Universitas Hasanuddin. Makasar.

Sagala, Z. 2010. Dampak Program PUAP terhadap Pendapatan Petani (Skipsi). Bogor : Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Setiani, B. 2015. Prinsip-Prinsip Pokok Pengelolaan Jasa Transportasi Udara. Jurnal Ilmiah Widya 3(2) : 103-109.

Setyanti, A.M. 2016. Analisis Biaya Transaksi Kelembagaan Kelompok Tani di Indonesia. http://www.scribed.com/document/335393060/analisis-biaya-transaksi-kelembagaan-kelompok-tani-docx [diakses 26 September 2017].

Sugiarto, D. Siagian, L.S. Sunarto, dan D.S. Oetomo. 2003. Teknik Sampling. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta

Wijianto, A. A.N. Rachmawati, dan S. Marwanti. 2012. Pengaruh Program PUAP terhadap Produktivitas dan Pendapatan Usahatani Padi di Kabupaten Kalirejo.

Williamson, O.E., 1986. Economic Organization : Firms, Market and Policy Control. New York : New York University Press

Yustika, A. E., 2006. Ekonomi Kelembagaan : Definisi, Teori dan Aplikasi. Universitas Brawijaya. Malang. 2006.

Suciati, L.P., Bambang, J., Akhmad, F. & Ernan, R. 2014. Peran Kelembagaan Perdesaan untuk Keberlanjutan Penerapan SRI diKabupaten Karawang. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Indonesia 14(2) : 109-126.

Suroso Y., 2012. Faktor-Faktor Dominan Yang Mempengaruhi Keberhasilan Pengembangan Usaha Agribisnis Pedesaan (PUAP) pada Usahatani padi Sawah dan jagung di Kab. Lampung Tengah (Tesis). Pascasarjana Fakultas Pertanian. Universitas Lampung.

Zulkarnain, Dwi H., Eka K., 2010. Keunggulan Komparatif dan Kompetitif dalam Produksi Padi di Kabupaten Lampung Tengah. Propinsi Lampung. Jurnal Pertanian Terapan 10(3) : 185-199.

Downloads

Published

2018-01-22

How to Cite

Zulkarnain, Z., & Mangiring, W. (2018). Analisis Biaya Transaksi pada Kelembagaan Pertanian Gapoktan Penerima Program Pengembangan Usaha Agribisnis Pedesaan (PUAP) di Desa Raman Aji Kecamatan Raman Utara Kabupaten Lampung Timur. Jurnal Penelitian Pertanian Terapan, 17(3), 186-196. https://doi.org/10.25181/jppt.v17i3.325

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 3 (2017)

Section

Artikel

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Lisensi Creative Commons