Desain Dan Modifikasi Mesin Panen Padi Tipe Mini Combine Untuk Menurunkan Nilai Groun Pressure

Authors

  • Sulha Pangaribuan Perekayasa pada Balai Besar Pengembangan Mekanisasi Pertanian
  • Lilik Tri Mulyantara Perekayasa pada Balai Besar Pengembangan Mekanisasi Pertanian
  • Anjar Suprapto Perekayasa pada Balai Besar Pengembangan Mekanisasi Pertanian

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25181/prosemnas.v0i0.711

Abstract

 Application of harvest and harvest handling machineries are able to reduce significantly grain losses of rice. Harvest and harvest handling of paddy consist of cutting, threshing, sortation, straw chopping and grain packaging. Those processes are combining into one process in rice combine harvester. Due to the fact performance of paddy combine harvester, the BBP Mektan was conducted reverse engineering design started since 2012 – 2014. Output of the activity in 2012 was a complete engineering detail drawing of the combine, while complete fabrication and testing have been done in the 2013. The purpose of the research is The expected output reverse engineering activities in 2013 are the following:  a) machine transport system, rubber track wheel that have ground pressure 0.11 to 0.14 kg/cm2; b) cutting width of the machine1.2 m; c) feeding whole type mechanism of threshing; d) total losses 0.8% - 1%; and e) working capacity less than 14 hours/ha. Results of field test were: a) ground pressure of rubber track wheel 0.13 kg/cm2; 2.51% of total losses; and working field capacity of the machine 5.6 hours/ha. From the observation, losses occur while cutting process that grain hitting thes crewand feeder plate. These losses will be reduced by modifying: auger rotation decreased from 225 rpm to about 160 rpm and the replacement ofthe feeder plate with steel re inforcing material thus reducing grain bounced out. Keyword : paddy, combine harvester

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baruah, D.C. and B.S. Panesar, 2005. Energy Requirement Model for a Combine Harvester, Part I: Development of Component Models. Biosystems Engineering (2005) 90 (1), 9–25

Chinsuwan, W., Chuan-udom, S., and Phayom, W. 2002. Rice Harvest Losses Assessment. TSAE Journal. 9(1), 14-19.

Chinsuwan, W., Pongjan, N., Chuan-udom, S. and Phayom,W. 2004. Effect of Reel Index on Gathering Loss of Rice Combine Harvester. TSAE Journal. 11(1), 7-9

Hummel, J.W. and Nave, W.R. 1979. Impact Cutting of Soybean Plants. Transactions of the ASAE 22(1), 35-39.

Hadi K.Purwadaria & Koes Sulistiadji, 2003, Petunujuk Operasional Mesin Perontok Biji-bijian, Panduan Teknis Penanganan Pasca Panen Gabah, Japan Grain Inspection Assiciation (KOKKEN), ODA Project, Food Agency Japan.

Junsiri, C. and Winit Chinsuwan, 2009. Prediction equations for header losses of combine harvesters when harvesting Thai Hom Mali rice. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 31 (6), 613-620, Nov. - Dec. 2009.

Klenin, N.I., Popov, I.F. and Sakun, V.A. 1986. Agricultural Machines: Theory of Operation, Computation of Controlling of Operation. Russian translations series 31. New Delhi (India): Gidson Printing Works

Quick, G. 1999. The Rice Harvester Reference. RIRDC Rice Research and Development Program. RIRDC Publication No. 99/38.

Siebenmorgen, T.J., Andrews, S.B. and Counce, P.A. 1994.Relationship of the Height Rice is Cut to Harvesting Test Parameters. Transactions of the ASAE 37(1), 67-69.

Tahir, A. R., Faizan U.H. K and Khurrm E., 2003. Techno-Economic Feasibility of Combine Harvester (Class Denominator) – A Case Study. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 1560–8530/2003/05–1–57–60.

Published

2018-02-14

Issue

Section

Artikel