Morpho-Physiology And Yield Performance Of Rice Genotypes In Wet Direct Seeding Methods

Authors

  • Ahmad Rifqi Fauzi Universitas Trilogi
  • Ahmad Junaedi Departemen Agronomi dan Hortikultura, Fakultas Pertanian, nstitut Pertanian Bogor (IPB) / Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB University
  • Iskandar Lubis Departemen Agronomi dan Hortikultura, Fakultas Pertanian, nstitut Pertanian Bogor (IPB) / Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB University
  • Munif Ghulamhdi Departemen Agronomi dan Hortikultura, Fakultas Pertanian, nstitut Pertanian Bogor (IPB) / Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB University
  • Hajrial Aswidinnoor Departemen Agronomi dan Hortikultura, Fakultas Pertanian, nstitut Pertanian Bogor (IPB) / Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25181/jppt.v24i1.2741

Abstract

The direct seeding of rice (DSR) system has been widely practiced in various Asian countries because it is considered more efficient in water and labor and provides better benefits than transplanting systems. However, improvements in the management of this system practice are still needed, especially in cropping patterns and the use of appropriate varieties. This study examines the physiological characteristics, yield components, and yields of rice genotypes in transplanting and DSR systems. This research was carried out in the field with transplanting and DSR cultivation systems (drill and broadcast sowing) and used four superior lines and one national variety. A total of 25 treatment combinations were designed using a split-plot randomized complete block design (Split plot-RCBD) with three replications for each treatment. The results showed that rice grown with DSR had no different level of greenery and photosynthesis rate than rice in transplanting cultivation, but produced lower panicle length, the number of grains per panicle, the number of filled grains, and faster flowering time. Genotype IPB193-F-17-2-3 produced the highest productivity in wet DSR (drill and broadcast sowing) and dry DSR (drill sowing). Genotype IPB193-F-38-2-1 had the highest productivity in transplanting techniques and dry DSR (broadcast method). The productivity of the Ciherang variety in the DSR system (drill method) was not different from the transplanting system. This finding indicates that the direct seeding system using the drill method is promising for further development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alexandratos, N. and Bruinsma, J. (2012) World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision, ESA Working Paper No. 12-03. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.288998.

Badan Pusat Statistik (2021) Ringkasan Eksekutif Luas Panen dan Produksi padi di Indonesia 2021.

Chen, S. et al. (2009) ‘Genotypic Differences in Growth and Physiological Responses to Transplanting and Direct Seeding Cultivation in Rice’, Rice Science, 16(2), pp. 143–150. doi:10.1016/S1672-6308(08)60071-2.

Dang, X. et al. (2014) ‘Genetic diversity and association mapping of seed vigor in rice (Oryza sativa L.)’, Planta, 239(6), pp. 1309–1319. doi:10.1007/s00425-014-2060-z.

Dingkuhn, M. et al. (1991) Direct seeded flooded tropical rice, Direct Seeded Flooded Rice in the Tropics.

Dubey, V.K. et al. (2022) ‘Weed management in herbicide-tolerant rice under direct-seeded conditions’, 11(7), pp. 668–672. Available at: https://www.thepharmajournal.com/archives/2022/vol11issue7S/PartI/S-11-7-25-914.pdf.

Dulbari, D. et al. (2018) ‘Karakter Agronomi dan Potensi Hasil 10 Genotipe Padi Tipe Baru pada Dua Lingkungan Tumbuh Berbeda’, Jurnal Penelitian Pertanian Terapan, 18(1), p. 24. doi:10.25181/jppt.v18i1.672.

Fauzi, A.R. et al. (2021) ‘Relationship of size and shape rice seed to early seedling vigor traits’, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 694(1). doi:10.1088/1755-1315/694/1/012039.

Fauzi, A.R. et al. (2022) ‘Evaluation of rice genotypes on seed attributes and agronomic performance for developing direct-seeded cultivar’, AIMS Agriculture and Food, 7(1), pp. 1–21. doi:10.3934/agrfood.2022001.

Gendua, P.A. et al. (2009) ‘Responses of yielding ability, sink size and percentage of filled grains to the cultivation practices in a Chinese large-panicle-type rice cultivar, Yangdao 4’, Plant Production Science, 12(2), pp. 243–256. doi:10.1626/pps.12.243.

Hirasawa, T. et al. (2009) ‘Varietal differences in photosynthetic rates in rice plants, with special reference to the nitrogen content of leaves’, Plant Production Science, 13(1), pp. 53–57. doi:10.1626/pps.13.53.

Huang, M. et al. (2011) ‘Yield component differences between direct-seeded and transplanted super hybrid rice’, Plant Production Science, 14(4), pp. 331–338. doi:10.1626/pps.14.331.

Jinwen, L. et al. (2009) ‘Responses of rice leaf thickness, SPAD readings and chlorophyll a/b ratios to different nitrogen supply rates in paddy field’, Field Crops Research, 114(3), pp. 426–432. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2009.09.009.

Kriswantoro, H. et al. (2018) ‘Karakteristik Agronomis Tiga Varietas Padi (Oryza sativa L.) pada Dua Sistem Tanam Benih di Lahan Pasang Surut’, Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy), 46(2), p. 140. doi:10.24831/jai.v46i2.15781.

Kumagai, E., Araki, A. and Kubota, F. (2009) ‘Correlation of Chlorophyll Meter Readings with Gas exchange and Chlorophyll Fluorescence in Flag Leaves of Rice ( Oryza sativa L.) Plants’, Plant Production Science, 12(1), pp. 50–53. doi:10.1626/pps.12.50.

Kumar, A. et al. (2015) ‘Productivity and economics of direct seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.)’, Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 7(1), pp. 410–416. doi:10.31018/jans.v7i1.625.

Kumar, V. and Ladha, J.K. (2011) Direct Seeding of Rice. Recent Developments and Future Research Needs. 1st edn, Advances in Agronomy. 1st edn. Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-387689-8.00001-1.

Lee, H.S. et al. (2021) ‘Physiological causes of transplantation shock on rice growth inhibition and delayed heading’, Scientific Reports, 11(1), pp. 1–13. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-96009-z.

Mahajan, G. and Chauhan, B.S. (2013) ‘The role of cultivars in managing weeds in dry-seeded rice production systems’, Crop Protection, 49, pp. 52–57. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2013.03.008.

Mahender, A., Anandan, A. and Pradhan, S.K. (2015) ‘Early seedling vigour, an imperative trait for direct-seeded rice: an overview on physio-morphological parameters and molecular markers’, Planta, 241(5), pp. 1027–1050. doi:10.1007/s00425-015-2273-9.

Matloob, A., Khaliq, A. and Chauhan, B.S. (2015) ‘Weeds of Direct-Seeded Rice in Asia: Problems and Opportunities’, Advances in Agronomy, pp. 291–336. doi:10.1016/bs.agron.2014.10.003.

Nurhermawati, R., Lubis, I. and Junaedi, A. (2021) ‘Respon Karakter Pengisian Biji dan Hasil terhadap Pemberian Pupuk Urea pada Empat Varietas Padi’, Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy), 49(3), pp. 235–241. doi:10.24831/jai.v49i3.37655.

Ohno, H. et al. (2018) ‘On-farm assessment of a new early-maturing drought-tolerant rice cultivar for dry direct seeding in rainfed lowlands’, Field Crops Research, 219, pp. 222–228. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2018.02.005.

Pane, H. (2003) ‘Kendala dan peluang pengembangan teknologi padi tanam benih langsung’, Litbang Pertanian, 22(4), pp. 172–178. Available at: http://203.190.37.42/publikasi/p3224036.pdf.

Pathak, H. et al. (2011) ‘Direct - seeded rice : Potential , performance and problems – A review’, Current Advances in Agricultural Sciences, 3(2), pp. 77–88.

Rao, A.N. et al. (2017) ‘Rice Production Systems’, in Rice Production Worldwide, pp. 185–205. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47516-5.

Ray, D.K. et al. (2013) ‘Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050’, PLoS ONE, 8(6). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066428.

Sandhu, N. et al. (2021) ‘Effective crop management and modern breeding strategies to ensure higher crop productivity under direct seeded rice cultivation system: A review’, Agronomy, 11(7), pp. 1–25. doi:10.3390/agronomy11071264.

Schnier, H.F. et al. (1990) ‘Nitrogen Fertilization of Direct‐Seeded Flooded vs. Transplanted Rice: I. Nitrogen Uptake, Photosynthesis, Growth, and Yield’, Crop Science, 30(6), pp. 1276–1284. doi:10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000060024x.

Tao, Y. et al. (2016) ‘Lower global warming potential and higher yield of wet direct-seeded rice in Central China’, Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 36(2). doi:10.1007/s13593-016-0361-2.

United Nation, U. (2019) ‘World population projected to reach 9.8 billion in 2050, and 11.2 billion in 2100’, UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, pp. 8–12.

Wang, W. et al. (2016) ‘Pre-sowing Seed Treatments in Direct-seeded Early Rice: Consequences for Emergence, Seedling Growth and Associated Metabolic Events under Chilling Stress’, Scientific Reports, 6(August 2015), pp. 1–10. doi:10.1038/srep19637.

Xu, Q. et al. (2020) ‘Effects of water stress on fluorescence parameters and photosynthetic characteristics of drip irrigation in rice’, Water (Switzerland), 12(1). doi:10.3390/w12010289.

Yamori, W. et al. (2020) ‘Increased stomatal conductance induces rapid changes to photosynthetic rate in response to naturally fluctuating light conditions in rice’, Plant, Cell & Environment, 43(5), pp. 1230–1240. doi:10.1111/pce.13725.

Zhang, B. and Yamagishi, J. (2010) ‘Response of Spikelet Number per Panicle in Rice Cultivars to Three Transplanting Densities’, Plant Prod. Sci., 13(February), pp. 279–288.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-31

How to Cite

Rifqi Fauzi, A. ., Junaedi, A. ., Lubis, I. ., Ghulamhdi, M. ., & Aswidinnoor, H. . (2024). Morpho-Physiology And Yield Performance Of Rice Genotypes In Wet Direct Seeding Methods. Jurnal Penelitian Pertanian Terapan, 24(1), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.25181/jppt.v24i1.2741

Issue

Section

Artikel