Assay of Mixture of Herbicide with Active Ingredients 2,4-D Dimethyl Amine+Isopropylamine Glyphosate against Weeds Ottochloa nodosa, Cyperus rotundus, and Praxelis clematidea

Authors

  • Ardan Maulana Universitas Lampung
  • Herry Susanto
  • Hidayat Pujisiswanto
  • Nanik Sriyani

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25181/jppt.v23i1.2294

Abstract

Chemical weed control in cultivated plants generally uses one herbicide active ingredient, but its effectiveness in controlling weeds can be increased by mixing herbicides. Mixing of more than 1 active ingredient can be additive, synergistic, and antagonistic with other active ingredients. Therefore, it is necessary to study the combination of herbicide active ingredients that will be used. The aim of the study was to determine the herbicide properties of a mixed 2,4-D dimethyl amine + Isopropylamine Glyphosate applied to the weeds Ottochloa nodosa, Cyperus rotundus, and Praxelis clematidea whether additive, synergistic, or antagonistic. The research was carried out from December 2020 to February 2021, at the Integrated Field Greenhouse and Weed Science Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Lampung. Using a Randomized Block Experiment Design (RAK) with treatment consisting of the herbicide Goldenstar with a single active ingredient 2,4- D dimethyl amine 100g/l with doses of active ingredients consisting of 25, 50, 100, and 200 g/ha, Isopropylamine Glyphosate 300 g/l with doses of active ingredients consisting of 75, 150, 300, and 600, g/ha and herbicides Goldenstar active ingredient mixture of 2,4-D dimethyl Amine + Isopropylamine Glyphosate 100/300 g/l with a dose of active ingredients consisting of 50, 100, 200, and 400 g/ha and control treatment (without herbicides). The target weeds included Otthocloa nososa, Cyperus rotundus, and Praxelis clematidea. Analysis to test the nature of herbicide mixture using the MSM (Multiplicative Survival Model) test. Furthermore, the co-toxicity value was calculated by comparing the expected LD50 and treatment LD50 values. The results showed that mixing herbicide with the active ingredient 2,4-D dimethyl Amine + Isopropylamine Glyphosate 100/300 g/l on the dry weight accumulation of the weeds Ottochloa nodosa, Cyperus rotundus, and Praxelis clematidea had an LD50 of 1.8424 g/ha and an LD50 of treatment. The expectation is 4.8270 g/ha with a co-toxicity value of 2.6 (co-toxicity value > 1) so that the herbicide mixture with the active ingredient 2,4-D dimethyl Amine + Isopropylamine Glyphosate 100/300 g/l is synergistic. . Keywords : 2,4-D dimethyl amine, Isopropylamine glyphosate, LD50, MSM (Multiplicative Survival Model)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Djojosumarto, P. (2008). Pestisida dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta: PT.Agromedia Pustaka.

Fadhly, A. F., & Tabri, F. (2007). Pengendalian Gulma pada Pertanaman Jagung. Balai Penelitian Tanaman Serealia.

Firison, J., Ishak, A., & Hidayat, T. (2019). Pemanfaatan Tumbuhan Bawah pada Tegakan Kelapa Sawit Oleh Masyarakat Lokal (Kasus di Desa Kungkai Baru, Kecamatan Air Periukan, Kabupaten Seluma – Bengkulu). AGRITEPA: Jurnal Ilmu Dan Teknologi Pertanian, 5(2), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.37676/agritepa.v5i2.776

Guntoro, D., & Fitri, T. Y. (2013). Aktivitas Herbisida Campuran Bahan Aktif Cyhalofop-Butyl dan Penoxsulam terhadap Beberapa Jenis Gulma Padi Sawah. Bul. Agrohorti, 1(1), 140–148.

Heap, I. (2011). Global Distribution of Herbicide Resistance. WSSA Herbicide Resistance Management Lesson 1. WSSA All Rights Reserved.

Mangoensoekarjo, S., & Soejono, A. T. (2015). Ilmu Gulma dan Pengelolaan pada Budidaya Perkebunan. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gajah Mada.

Moenandir, J. (1990). Pengantar Ilmu Gulma. Jakarta: PT.Raja Grafindo Persada.

Mukarromah, L., Sembodo, D. R. J., & Sugiatno, S. (2014). Efikasi Herbisida Glifosat Terhadap Gulma Di Lahan Tanaman Kelapa Sawit (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) Belum Menghasilkan. Jurnal Agrotek Tropika, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.23960/jat.v2i3.2048

Palijama, W., Riry, J., & Wattimena, A. Y. (2012). Komunitas Gulma Pada Pertanaman Pala (Myristica fragrans H) Belum Menghasilkan Dan Menghasilkan Di Desa Hutumuri Kota Ambon. Agrologia, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.30598/a.v1i2.289

Parademian, M. (2017). Kupas Tuntas Agribisnis Kelapa Sawit. Jakarta Timur: Swadaya.

Prasetyo, H., & Zaman, S. (2016). Pengendalian Gulma Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) di Perkebunan Padang Halaban, Sumatera Utara. Buletin Agrohorti, 4(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.29244/agrob.4.1.87-93

Purba, E. (2000). Pengujian Lapangan Efikasi Herbisida Ristop 240 AS terhadap Gulma pada Budidaya Karet Menghasilkan. Publikasi. Universitas Sumatera Utara, 3.

Sarjono, B. Y., & Zaman, S. (2017). Pengendalian Gulma pada Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) di Kebun Bangun Koling. Buletin Agrohorti, 5(3), 384. https://doi.org/10.29244/agrob.5.3.384-391

Sembodo, D. R. J. (2010). Gulma dan Pengelolaannya. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Sigalingging, D. R., Sembodo, D. R. S. R. J., & Sriyani, N. (2014). Efikasi herbisida Glifosat untuk mengendalikan gulma pada pertanaman kopi (Coffea canephora) menghasilkan. Jurnal Agrotek Tropika, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.23960/jat.v2i2.2095

Streibig, J. C. (2003). Assessment of herbicide effects. Florida, USA:CRC Press, Boca Raton.

Widaryanto, E., Sugiarto, A. N., & Ebtan, R. (2014). Ketahanan beberapa varietas jagung manis (Zea mays saccharata S.) terhadap populasi gulma Teki (C. rotundus. Jurnal Produksi Tanaman, 16(1), 471– 477.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-30

How to Cite

Maulana, A., Susanto, H., Pujisiswanto, H., & Sriyani, N. (2023). Assay of Mixture of Herbicide with Active Ingredients 2,4-D Dimethyl Amine+Isopropylamine Glyphosate against Weeds Ottochloa nodosa, Cyperus rotundus, and Praxelis clematidea. Jurnal Penelitian Pertanian Terapan, 23(1), 64-72. https://doi.org/10.25181/jppt.v23i1.2294

Issue

Section

Artikel