Peranan LKM-A dalam Mendorong Percepatan Adopsi Teknologi Jagung di Sumatera Barat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25181/jppt.v14i1.138Abstract
Microfinance Institutions (LKM-A) is a venture capital under the auspices gapoktan. LKM-A growing and evolving through the Rural Agribusiness Development Program (PUAP) with facilitation fund capital gain Rp. 100 million per gapoktan which began in 2008 and continued until 2013. LKM-A were grown in 2008 and 2009 has been developed with venture capital indicators (asset) is over Rp. 150 million. The capital rent to farmers to develop agricultural businesses, one of which corn business. This paper aims to study the expression of the results to identify maize technology adoption rates in the region work Gapoktan/LKM-A in the maize production centers like Limapuluh Kota and Tanah Datar district. Survey conducted in 2012 by taking a sample of 2 Gapoktan per district with LKM-A asset criteria over Rp. 150 million and has been operating 3-4 years. Sample farmers in each region gapoktan 30 people selected randomly, consisting of 15 farmers member of LKM-A and 15 farmers not a member of LKM-A. The data were analyzed by farm analysis and comperative analysis before and after the LKM-A. The result showed that after the LKM-A, maize technology adoption by farmers of members increased compared to before there LKM-A. Before there LKM-A. majority of farmers in Limapuluh Kota District has adopted several major technologies such as (i) seed labeled 70%, (ii) 90.0% of hybrid, (iii) site-specific fertilization 36.7%. Once there LKM-A. turns the main technology adoption increases, respectively, to 100.0%, 100.0% and 90.0%. Adoption of maize technology before there LKM-A. in Tanah Datar, namely (i) the user seed labeled 63.3%, (ii) hybrid 73.3% and (iii) site-specific fertilization 30.0%, and after LKM-A. increased adoption row to be 90.0%, 90.0% and 70.0%. Other technology components also changed for the better. Technology adoption by members LKM-A is also more than the farmers are not members at the same time. Technology improvements to increase corn yields and farm profits and additional economically viable investment for technological improvements by indicators in Limapuluh Kota district MBCR = 2.72 and 1.76 in Tanah Datar district. Conclusion, that the dissemination of the technology needs to be followed by the provision of capital resources in conditions of available technology, is able to accelerate the adoption of technology. Suggested to the stakeholders that are easily accessible sources of capital such as small farmers LKM-A. needs to be developed in rural areas, in order to support the acceleration of adoption of technological innovations and development of agribusiness at farmer level.. Keywords: Corn, LKM-A, capital, technology adoption, incomeDownloads
References
Jurnal Penelitian Pertanian Terapan
Volume 14, Nomor 1, Januari 2014
Hendaryana, R. A. Gozali. E. Syaefulah, A. Jauhari dan R. S, Hutomo. 2009. Desain model percepatan
adopsi inovasi teknologi program unggulan Badan Litbang Pertanian. Seminar Hasil Pengkajian
SINTA 2009, Badan Litbang Pertanian 9 - 10 Desember 2009.
Hosen, N dan Yulmar Jastra. Keragaan teknologi sistem tanam sebatang padi sawah di Sumatera
Barat. Prosiding Seminar Nasional “Inovasi teknologi pertanian mendukung ketahanan pangan
dan agribisnis perdesaan. Balai Besar Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Teknologi Pertanian dan
Pemda Provinsi Papua. 2010. Nuku II: Hal 497-504
Kementerian Pertanian, 2010. Pedoman Umum Pengembangan Usaha Agribisnis Perdesaan (PUAP)
tahun 2010. Kemnterian Pertanian. Jakarta.
Mundy, P. 2000. Investasi untuk komunikasi di Badan Litbang Pertanian (PATTP). Desember 2000.
Sekretariat PUAP. 2012. Data dasar Program Pengembangan Usaha Agribisnis Perdesaan (PUAP)
-2012 di Sumatera Barat. Sekretariat PUAP Provinsi Sumatera Barat. BPTP Sumatera
Barat.
Singarimbun, M dan Sofian Effendi. 1982. Metode Penelitian Survai. LP3ES. Jakarta.
Sukartawi; A. Soeharjo; John L. Dillon dan J. Brian Hardaker. 1984. Ilmu usahatani dan penelitian
untuk pengembangan petani kecil. UI. Jakarta.
Tim GPP Provonsi Sumatera Barat. 2011. Pedoman Umum Gerakan Pensejahteraan Petani di
Sumatera Barat. Pemerintah Provinsi Sumatera Barat. PadangAdnyana, M.O. dan Ketut Kariyasa. 2006. Dampak dan persepsi petani terhadap penerapan system
pengeloaan tanaman terpadu padi sawah. Jurnal Penelitian Pertanian Tanaman Pangan.
Puslitbang Tanaman Pangan. Vol. 25 No. 1. Hal 21-29.
Bappeda, 2011. Sumatera Barat dalam angka tahun 2011. Bappeda dan Badan Pusat Statistik Propinsi
Sumatera Barat. Padang.
BPTP Sumatera Barat, 2009. Buku informasi paket teknologi adapatif. BPTP Sumatera Barat. Padang.
BPTP Sumatera Barat, 2010. Laporan diseminasi teknologi adaptif bagi Gapoktan pelaksana Program
PUAP 2008-2010 di Sumatera Barat. BPTP Sumatera Barat. Padang.
Bustamam, S., M. Sarwani., S. S. Tan., A. Rivaie., Saefudin, 2009. Laporan akhir kajian umpan balik
percepatan inovasi teknologi dan kelembagaan. BBP2TP. Bogor.
Dinas Pertanian Tanaman Pangan Provinsi Sumatera Barat. 2011. Laporan Perkembangan produksi
padi di Sumatera Barat. Pemerintah Provinsi Sumatera Barat, Dinas Pertanian Tanamn Pangan
Provinsi Sumatera Barat. Padang.
Hendaryana, R. A. Dhalimi. Sumedi. R. Sad Hutomo. 2006. Seminar Hasil Pengkajian Inovasi dan
Diseminasi Program Prima Tani. BBP2TP. Bogor.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.