PELATIHAN ON GOING ASSESSMENT DAN INSTRUMEN PENILAIAN HIGHER ORDER THINKING SKILLS (HOTS) BAGI GURU SMA DI KOTA BANDAR LAMPUNG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25181/jpn.v2i1.1573Abstract
Kegiatan pelatihan ini bertujuan untuk: (1) Meningkatkan pemahaman dan keterampilan Guru tingkatSMA se-Bandar Lampung terhadap penerapan On Going Assessment dan instrumen penilaianberbasis HOTS; (2) Meningkatkan pemahaman dan keterampilan guru tingkat SMA se-BandarLampung dalam mengimplementasikan standar penilaian dalam Kurikulum 2013. Metode yangdigunakan dalam kegiatan ini adalah diskusi, tanya jawab, workshop, dan pelatihan denganmenerapkan strategi kontekstual, yaitu mengaitkan teori dengan praktik yang disampaikan denganmetode praktik terbimbing. Khalayak sasaran kegiatan pelatihan ini adalah 35 orang guru yangtergabung dalam Musyawarah Guru Mata Pelajaran (MGMP) Fisika SMA se-Kota Bandar Lampung.Evaluasi keberhasilan pelatihan akan dilakukan pada: (1) Awal kegiatan, yaitu pre-test, untukmengetahui sejauh mana kemampuan peserta pelatihan tentang on going assessment; (2) Akhirkegiatan, yaitu post-test, berisikan pertanyaan yang sama dengan tes awal, untuk mengetahui tingkatkeberhasilan, sehingga dapat diterapkan oleh setiap peserta. Data yang diperoleh dianalisis secaradeskriptif kuantitatif. Pelatihan on going assessment dan keterampilan berbasis Higher Order ThinkingSkills sebanyak 27 peserta memperoleh hasil rata-rata 77,14% mengalami kenaikan nilai dari pre-testke post-test. Sedangkan, sebanyak 3 peserta memperoleh hasil rata-rata 8,57% mengalamipenurunan nilai pre-test ke post-test, dan sebanyak 5 peserta yang memperoleh hasil rata-rata14,28% mengalami penilaian yang tetap dari pre-test ke post-test. Berdasarkan hasil perolehantersebut pelatihan ini berhasil dikarenakan adanya peningkatan pengetahuan mengenai on goingassessment dan keterampilan berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skills. Adapun sebagian kecil yangmengalami penurunan ini dikarenakan perbedaan jenis soal, yang mana pre-test berbentuk uraiandan post-test berbentuk pilihan jamak beserta uraian.Downloads
References
Bao, Lei; Fang, Kai; Cai, Tianfang; Wang, Jing; Yang, Lijia; Cui, Lili; Han, Jing and Ding, Lin; Luo, Ying. (2009). Learning Of Content Knowledge And Development Of Scientific Reasonin Ability: A Cross Culture Comparison. Am.J. Phys. 77 _12_, December 2009 http://aapt.org/ajp
Blumenfeld, Krajcik, Fishman, Soloway, Geier, Tal. (2004). Inquiry-Based Science in The Middle Grades: Assessment of Learning in Urban Systemic Reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. • irst published: 1 November 2004. Full publication history. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20039
Cai dan Cirillo. (2014). What do we know about reasoning and proving? Opportunities and missing opportunities from curriculum analyses. International Journal of Educational Research. Journal home page: www. elsevier.com /locate/ijedures
Duschl, R., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse. Studies in Science Education, 38, pp. 39-72.
Good, T. L., Brophy, J. E. (1990). Educational psychology: A Realistic Approach.
(4th ed.).White Plains, NY:
LongmanHeron, Paula R. L; Loverude, Michael E; Shaffer, P. S., and McDermott L. C. (2003). Helping Students Develop an Understanding of Archimedes’ Principle. II. Development Of Research-Based Instructional Materials. American Journal of Physics. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1607337
Howe, C., McWilliams, D., & Cross, G. (2005). Chance Favours the Prepared Mind: Incubation and The Delayed Effects of Peer Collaboration. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 67-93
Knight, J. K., Wise, S. B., & Southard, K. M. (2013). Understanding Clicker Discussions: Student Reasoning and the Impact of Instructional Cues. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 12(4), 645-654. doi:10.1187/cbe.13-05-0090
Leach, J., & Scott, P. (2003). Individual and Sociocultural Views of Learning in Science Education, Science & Education, 12, 91-113.
Loverude, Michael E., Kautz, Christian H., & Heron, Paula R. L. (2003). Helping Students Develop an Understanding of Archimedes’ principle. I. Research on Student Understanding. American Journal of Physics 71, 1178 (2003); doi: 10.1119/1.1607335
Nurdin, Syaiful Imam Ali, Viyanti. (2016). The Design Of Performance Assessment Based Inquiry For Empowering Students Argumentation Skills. Proseding. International Conference on Educational Research and Evaluation (ICERE).
Mizrap dan Nermin. (2013). Formative Assessment in Science Teaching and
Demonstration of its Effective Implementation. Journal of Turkish Science
Education Volume 10, Issue 4, December 2013
Osborne, J., & Patterson, A. (2011). Scientific argument and explanation: A necessary distinction? Science Education, 95(4), 627–638. doi: 10.1002/sce.20438
Popham, W.J. (1995). Classroom Assessment, What Teachers Need it Know.
Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Saleta, Martı´n Eduardo; Tobia, Dina; Gil, Salvador. (2004). Experimental Study Of Bernoulli’s Equation With Losses. Am. J. Phys. 73 ~7!, July 2005. http://aapt.org/ajp
Stiggins, R.J. (1994). Student Centered Classroom Assessment. New York, Mac Millan College Publishing Company. Simon dan Richardson (2009)
Wulan, Ana Ratna. (2015). Pengembangan Kreativitas Pada Pembelajaran Sains Melalui Asesmen Autentik. Proseding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan MIPA 2015. ISBN 978-979-3262-11-6.
