The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure of Return Assets Through Sales Growth as Intervening Variable
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25181/esai.v5i3.1016Abstract
This study aims to analyze the effects of corporate social responsibility disclosure of return on assets (ROA) through sales growth. population Sampling of this study are the firms within industries with high level of environmental pollution (for example: paper and allied products, mining and mining services, metal and allied products, fabricated metal products, electronics and office equipment and chemicals and Allied products). The path analysis model was used to measure the effect of corporate social responsibility disclosure, as an exogenous variable, of return on assets (ROA), as endogenous variable, through sales growth as an intervening variable. Based on this research, it was found that 1) corporate social responsibility disclosure had positive effect on sales growth, 2) corporate social responsibility disclosure and sales growth simultaneously and partially had positive effect on return on assets (ROA). Keywords: corporate social responsibility disclosure, return on assets (ROA), sales growthDownloads
References
Alwi, S.F dan DaSilva, R.V. 2007. Online and Offline Corporate Brand Image : Do They Differ?. Corporate Reputation Review. Vol 10 No.4 pg 217-244.
Andayani, MWangi, dan Atmini, 2008. Corporate Social Responsibility. Good Corporate Governance And The Intellectual Property: An External Strategy Of The Management To Increase The Company’s Value. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 10.
Aupperle, K.E. Archie, B.C. dan John, D.H.. 1985. An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 28, No. 2. 446-463.
Barnea, Amir dan Rubin, Amir. 2005. Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict between Shareholders.
Freedman, M dan Jaggi, M.. 1988. An analysis of the association between pollution disclosure and economic performance. Accounting. Auditing & Accountability Journal.Vol. 1, No. 2. pp. 43-58.
Hackston, David dan Milne, Marcus J.. 1996. Some Determinants Of Social And Environmental Disclosures In New Zaeland Companies. Accounting. Auditing and Accountability Journal. Vol. 9, No. 1. pp. 77-108.
Kotler, Philip dan Lee, Nancy. 2005. Corporate Social Responsibility. New Jersey : John Wiley and Sons. Inc.
Isa Wahyudi. 2008. CSR : Prinsip. Pengaturan dan Implementasi. In-Trans Publising. Malang.
McGuire, J.B. Sundgren, Alison dan Schneeweis, Thomas. 1988. Corporate Social Responsibilityand Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal.
Mathews, M.R. 1997. Twenty-five years of Social and Environmental. Accounting Research. Accounting, Auditing, & Accountability Journal Vol. 10, No.4 p. 481- 531.
McGuire, J.B. Sundgren, Alison dan Schneeweis, Thomas. 1988. Corporate Social Responsibilityand Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal.
Memed, Sueb. 2001. Pengaruh Internalisasi Biaya Sosial Terhadap Kinerja Sosial dan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Terbuka di Indonesia. Disertasi. Tidak dipublikasikan.
Nor, Hadi. 2009. Summary Executive- Corporate Social Responsibility. Disertasi.
Riduwan dan Kuncoro, E.A. 2008. Cara Menggunakan dan Memaknai Analisis Jalur (Path Analysis). Alfabeta. Bandung.
Samiloglu, F. dan Demirgunes, K.. 2008. The effect of working capital management on firm profitability: Evidence from Turkey. The Int. J. Applied Econ. Finance. 2: 44-50.
Sofyan, Syafri Harahap. 2008. Teori Akuntansi. Edisi Revisi-10. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta.
Teppo, Anna. 2008. CSR Reporting and Financial Market Performance : Do Investors Care about CSR Disclosure?. Thesis.
WCED. 1987. Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development.
Yusuf Wibisono. 2007. Membedah Konsep dan Aplikasi CSR. Gresik. Fascho Publishing. Gresik.
