Pengaruh Komitmen Organisasi Dan Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Hubungan Antara Partisipasi Anggaran Dan Kinerja Manajerial (Studi Empiris Pada Kantor Cabang Perbankan Di Propinsi Lampung)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25181/esai.v2i1.1312Abstrak
The effect of participation in the budgeting process to improve managerial performance has been an interesting area of research for many years. It has been postulated that participative budgeting has a positive effect on managerial performance. Several prior researchers, held to examine the relationship between participative budgeting and managerial performance, have yielded the inconsistent result. To overcome this phenomenon, some researchers suggest using contingency approach which looks at the moderating effect of organizational comitment and leadership styles. This research examined the effect of organizational commitment and leadership styles on the effectiveness of participative budgeting to increase managerial performance. The responses from 25 heads from Lampung banking companies to a questionnaire survey designed to measure the variables, were analyzed using a multiple regression model. The result indicated that there is no significant effect between participative budgeting and managerial performance. In addition, both organizational commitment and leadership styles don’t moderate the relationship between participative budgeting and managerial performance.  Keywords : participative budgeting, organizational commitment, leadership styles, and managerial performance.Unduhan
Referensi
Angle, H.L. and J.L. Perry, (1981). An Empirical Assessment of organizational
Commitment and Organizational Effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly26, pp. 1-14.
Amrul, Sadat S dan Nasir , Moch, Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Ketidakpastian
Lingkungan terhadap Hubungan antara Partisipasi Penganggaran dengan
Senjangan Anggaran, Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 5, Semarang tanggal 5 –
September 2002, hal. 384 – 399.
Becker, S. dan D. Green (1962), Budgeting and Employee Behavior, Journal of
Business, October, hal. 392-402
Brownell, Peter, Leadership Style, Budgetary Participation and Managerial Behavior,
Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 307 – 321, 1983
----------------------, The Role of Accounting Data In Performance Evaluation, Budgetary
Participation, and Organizational Effectiveness, Journal of Accounting
Research, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 12 – 27, Spring 1982, Printed in USA.
Brownell, Peter and Hirst, Mark, Reliance on Accounting Information, Budgetary
Participation, and Task Uncertainty : Tests of a Three - Way Interaction, Journal of Accounting Research Vol. 24, No. 2 Autumn, pp. 241 – 251, 1986
Brownell, Peter and McInnes, Morris, Budgetary Participation, Motivation, and
Managerial Performance, The Accounting Review, Vol. LXI, No. 4, pp. 587 –
, October 1986.
Brownell, P. and Dunk, A. 1991. Task uncertainty and its interaction with budgetary
participation and budget emphasis : some methodological issues and empirical
investigation. Accounting, organizations and society, 16, pp. 693-703.
Bruns, Jr. W.J. and Waterhouse, J. H. Budgetary Control and Organization Structure,
Journal of Accounting Research, pp. 177 – 203, Autumn, 1975
Cahyono, Dwi dan Ghozali, Imam, Pengaruh Jabatan, Budaya Organisasional dan
Konflik Peran terhadap Hubungan Kepuasan Kerja dengan Komitmen
Organisasi, Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia, Vol. 5, No. tanggal 3 September
, Hal. 341 – 364.
Cherrington, D.J. dan Cherrington, J.O (1973), Appropriate Reinforcement
Contigencies in the Budgeting Process, Journal of Accounting Research,
(supplemen), hal. 225-253
Chenhall, R.H., and Brownell, P. (1988). The effect of participative budgeting on job
satisfaction and performance : role ambiguity as an intervening variable.
Accounting, organization and society, 13, 3, pp. 225-233.
Fisher, J.G. (1995). Contingency-based research on management control systems :
categorization by level of complexity. Journal of accounting literature, 14, pp.
-53.
Galbraith, J.R. (1973). Designing complex organizations. MA : Addison Wesley.
Gordon, L.A., dan Miller, (1976). A Contingency Framework for the Design of
Accounting Information System. Accounting, Organization and Society, pp.
-69.
Hayes, D.C. (1997). The contingency theory of management accounting. The
Accounting review (January), pp. 22-39.
Hopwood, A.G. (1976). Accounting and human behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice Hall.
Hofstede, G.(1968), The Game of Budget Control: How Live with Budgetary
Standards and yet be Motivated by Them, Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
Indriantoro, Nur, An Empirical Study of Locus of Control and Cultural Dimensions as
Moderating Variables of The Effect of Participative Budgeting on Job
Performance and Job Satisfaction, Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Indonesia, Vol.
, No. 1, 2000, Hal. 97 – 114.
Indriantoro, Nur dan Supomo, Bambang, 1999, Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis untuk
Akuntansi dan Manajemen, BPFE, Yogyakarta.
Ivancevich, J. (1976). The effects of goal setting on performance and job satisfaction.
Journal of applied psychology (Oct), pp. 605-612.
Kenis, I. (1979). Effect of budgetary goal characteristics on managerial attitudes and
performance. The accounting review, 54, pp. 707-721.
Locke, E.A., and Latham, G. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice Hall.
Milani, Ken, The Relationship of Participation in Budget-Setting to Industrial
SupervisorPerformance and Attitudes : A Field Study, The Accounting
Review, pp. 274 – 284, April 1975.
Mia, Lokman, The Impact of Participation in Budgeting and Job Difficulty on
Managerial Performance and Work Motivation : A Research Note,
Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 347 – 357, 1989.
