Is explicit grammar teaching unnecessary in F/SL acquisition?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25181/esai.v8i1.972Abstrak
 Metode pengajaran bahasa asing yang dikembangkan beberapa dasawarya terakhir  menempatkan tata bahasa pada posisi marjinal. Tata bahasa tidak lagi menempati posisi sentral seperti pada awal perkembangan metode pengajaran bahasa asing. Ada pandangan yang menyatakan bahwa tata bahasa hanya perlu diajarkan sesekali dan bahkan ada paradigma yang menyatakan bahwa tata bahasa sama sekali tidak perlu lagi diajarkan secara eksplisit. Artinya, pembalajaran bahasa asing diyakini akan tetap berhasil dengan baik walaupun tanpa melibatkan pembelajaran tata bahasa. Sehingga tata bahasa tidak mendapat porsi pengajaran sama sekali. Paradigma tersebut mengejawantah dalam metode pengajaran seperti CLT atau TBLT dan mendapat dukungan luas dari para praktisi pengajaran bahasa asing. Meskipun demikian, paradigma tersebut perlu ditinjau ulang karena banyak hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengajaran tata bahasa memberikan hasil yang positif bagi penguasaan bahasa asing. Oleh karena itu, pengajaran tata bahasa tetap perlu dilaksanakan, namun harus dengan mengacu pada cara-cara pengajaran yang benar.Kata kunci: tata bahasa, eksplisit, implisitUnduhan
Referensi
Cook, V. (2008) Second Language Learning and Language Teaching.4 ed London: Hodder Education.
Doughty, C. (1991) 'Second Language Instruction Does Make a Difference', Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, (04), pp. 431-469.
Ellis, N. C. (2005) 'At The Interface: Dynamic Interactions Of Explicit And Implicit Language Knowledge', Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, (02), pp. 305-352.
Ellis, R. O. D. (1984) 'Can Syntax be Taught? A Study of the Effects of Formal Instruction on the Acquisition of WH Questions by Children', Applied Linguistics, 5, (2), pp. 138-155.
Harley, B. (1989) 'Functional Grammar in French Immersion: A Classroom Experiment', Applied Linguistics, 10, (3), pp. 331-360.
Krashen, S. D. (1981) 'The 'fundamental pedagogical principle in second language teaching' ', Studia Linguistica, 35, (1-2), pp. 50-70.
Krashen, S. D. (1982) 'Principles and practice in second language acquisition', in Oxford; New York: Pergamon.
Logan, G. D. (1988) 'Toward an instance theory of automatization', Psychological Review, 95, (4), pp. 35.
Macaro, E. and Masterman, L. (2006) 'Does intensive explicit grammar instruction make all the difference?', Language Teaching Research, 10, (3), pp. 297-327.
Macrory, G. and Stone, V. (2000) 'Pupil progress in the acquisition of the perfect tense in French: the relationship between knowledge and use', Language Teaching Research, 4, (1), pp. 55-82.
Marand, E. S. and Dasgoshadeh, A. (2011) 'Teachers' beliefs about grammar teaching', European Journal of Social Sciences, 23, (1), pp. 53-60.
Scheffler, P. and Cinciała, M. (2011) 'Explicit grammar rules and L2 acquisition', ELT Journal, 65, (1), pp. 13-23.
Schmidt, R. W. (1990) 'The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning', Applied Linguistics, 11, (2), pp. 129-158.
Spada, N. and Lightbown, P. M. (1993) 'Instruction and the Development of Questions in L2 Classrooms', Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, (02), pp. 205-224.
Tode, T. (2007) 'Durability problems with explicit instruction in an EFL context: the learning of the English copula be before and after the introduction of the auxiliary be', Language Teaching Research, 11, (1), pp. 11-30.
Truscott, J. (1998) 'Noticing in second language acquisition: a critical review', Second Language Research, 14, (2), pp. 103-135.
White, L., Spada, N., Lightbown, P. M. and Ranta, L. (1991) 'Input Enhancement and L2 Question Formation', Applied Linguistics, 12, (4), pp. 416-432
