The Participation of Koptan and KUD Members Paddy Farmer in Lampung Province
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25181/esai.v5i3.1019Abstrak
This research aims to: (1) analyze the level of member participation in the RAT, the payment of mandatory savings, and the utilization of services provided by Koptan and KUD, (2) analyze factors that influence the level of member participation.  The research is conducted with descriptive method. Research locations specified in the three districts with the highest number of Koptan and KUD as well as dominant rice production centers in Lampung Province. They are Central Lampung, East Lampung, and South Lampung. From each district is taken two Koptan and two KUD purposively. The sample size of farmer is 50 members of Koptan and 47 members of KUD. Member participation levels are analyzed descriptively and the factors which influence them are analyzed by multiple linear regression model. The member participation level in the RAT is high. Household income affects the Koptan member participation in the RAT negatively, while the cooperative economic benefit has a positive effect. The experiences as cooperative member and the number of dependents negatively affect KUD member participation in the RAT, while the cooperative economic benefit, non-formal education, and member satisfaction in the RAT have a positive effect. The member participation level in paying mandatory savings is moderate. Age negatively affects Koptan member participation in paying mandatory savings, while the experiences as cooperative member and cooperative economic benefit have a positive effect. Age positively affects KUD member participation in paying mandatory savings, while the distance from home to KUD has a negative effect. The member participation level in service utilization is low. Number of dependents and SHU positively affect Koptan member participation in utilizing business units, while the number of cooperation has a negative effect. The distance from home to KUD, SHU, and the suitability of the business unit positively affect KUD member participation in utilizing business units, while the number of business units has a negative influence. Keywords : member participation, koptan, KUDUnduhan
Referensi
Alimoeso, S., 2009. Pembangunan Agribisnis untuk Mewujudkan Kedaulatan Pangan Nasional. Pidato Keynote Speech dalam Seminar Nasional Membangun Agribisnis untuk Menggerakkan Perekonomian Nasional yang Kuat dan Berdaulat. Lustrum II MMA UGM. Yogyakarta.
Badan Pusat Statistik, 2006. Lampung dalam Angka. Kerjasama BPS dan BAPPEDA Provinsi Lampung. BPS Provinsi Lampung. Bandar Lampung.
Chabachib, M., 2001. Pengaruh Kualitas Manajemen, Partisipasi Anggota, serta Lingkungan Usaha terhadap Pelaksanaan Manajemen dan Kinerja Keuangan KUD di Jawa Tengah. Disertasi. Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Padjadjaran. Bandung.
Deputi Bidang Kelembagaan Koperasi dan UKM, 2009. Kebijakan Pemerintah dalam Pengembangan Koperasi Unit Desa (KUD). Disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional Revitalisasi Koperasi Unit Desa untuk Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Perdesaan. Kerjasama Laboratorium Koperasi Jurusan Sosek Fakultas Pertanian UGM dengan Kementerian Negara Koperasi dan UKM. Yogyakarta.
Dinas Koperasi, Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah Provinsi Lampung, 2008a. Profil Dinas Koperasi, Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah: Potensi Sumberdaya Alam Sektor Koperasi dan UKM Provinsi Lampung. Bandar Lampung.
Dinas Koperasi, Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah Provinsi Lampung, 2008b. Profil Kinerja Dinas Koperasi, Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah Provinsi Lampung. Bandar Lampung.
Fathorrazi, M., 2007. Analisis Komparatif Faktor Partisipasi Anggota, Kinerja SDM, Peran Pemerintah, dan Tingkat Keberhasilan antara Koperasi Multi Usaha dan Tunggal Usaha pada Koperasi Susu Sapi Perah di Jawa Timur. Disertasi. Universitas Airlangga. Surabaya.
Gujarati, D. N., 1988. Basic Econometrics. Second Edition. Mc. Graw Hill International Editions. Singapore.
Harsono, 1985. Faktor-faktor yang Menentukan Keberhasilan Koperasi Unit Desa di Kabupaten Malang. Disertasi. Fakultas Pasca Sarjana UGM. Yogyakarta.
Mutis, T., 1992. Pengembangan Koperasi Kumpulan Karangan. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia. Jakarta.
Ropke, J., 1989. The Economic Theory of Cooperative. University of Phillips. Marburg. West Germany.
Saragih, B., 1998. Agribisnis, Paradigma Baru Pembangunan Ekonomi Berbasis Pertanian (Kumpulan Pemikiran). Percetakan CV. Nasional. Jakarta.
Sinaga, P., 2005. Relationship Between Group Cohesiveness, Achievement Motivation, Entrepreneurship Attitude, Members’ Participation Attitude and Cooperative performance of High Performing and Low Performing Cooperatives in Bandung Regency Indonesia. Disertasi Bidang Counselling Psycologhy, dalam Koperasi dalam Sorotan Peneliti.
Widarjono, A., 2007. Ekonometrika. Teori dan Aplikasi untuk Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Penerbit Ekonisia. Fakultas Ekonomi UII. Yogyakarta.
